Liquid Restaking Tokens vs Liquid Staking Tokens

What is the Difference Between LRTs and LSTs?

A liquid staking token (LST) is a receipt token created by a liquid staking protocol to indicate ownership of one’s staked assets and the rewards they accrued in a proof of stake network. An example of this is Lido minting stETH for stakers. This token allows participants to maintain liquidity, as it can be traded, transferred, or used within decentralized applications while the underlying assets remain staked in the network.

A liquid restaking token (LRT), on the other hand, is a derivative of LSTs, minted for use in restaking via protocols like EigenLayer that enable staked assets such as ETH and LSTs (e.g. stETH or mETH) to be utilized for securing additional networks.

LRTs represent ownership of these restaked tokens and the rewards they generate, thereby increasing the leverage and utility of the originally staked assets by enabling participation in multiple network securities.

‍

How Liquid Restaking Tokens Work

Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) are used to facilitate liquidity while participating in restaking activities, specifically designed to work within platforms like EigenLayer. Here's a technical overview of their operation and unique characteristics:

Basic Working Mechanism:

• Minting: LRTs are minted when users deposit their liquid staking tokens (LSTs), such as stETH or frxETH, into the restaking process enabled by EigenLayer. This is done through protocols like Kelp DAO, which mint rsETH in return. 

Characteristics and Functionalities of LRTs:

• Ownership Representation: Each LRT corresponds to a share in the ownership of the restaked tokens, including LSTs and other assets deployed in EigenLayer for restaking purposes.
• Transferability and Liquidity: LRTs can be freely transferred or traded in the market, providing liquidity to stakeholders.
• Yield and Rewards Accumulation: Holders of LRTs receive yields from the EigenLayer points resulting from restaking operations. These points rank as network rewards collected and distributed among LRT holders proportionate to their investment. They also receive additional points from the staking protocol they use (e.g. Renzo or Kelp).

By employing staked assets in securing multiple networks, LRTs serve not merely as liquidity providers but also as tools for accruing additional network rewards from the supported restaking activities on EigenLayer.

‍

How Does EigenLayer Earn Yield for LRTs?

EigenLayer generates yield for Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) by leveraging a process known as restaking. Here, staked Ethereum (ETH) and liquid staking tokens (LSTs) deposited onto EigenLayer are utilized to secure multiple protocols. This is done through Actively Validated Services (AVSs), where these staked assets support network security and thereby accumulate rewards and fees.

For LRT holders, these rewards are distributed in proportion to their stake in the pooled assets on EigenLayer. The participation in AVSs allows these assets to not only secure Ethereum but also to earn from the additional protocols they support, maximizing the yield potential for stakeholders.

‍

Liquid Staking Token vs Liquid Restaking Token Risks

When comparing the risks between Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) and Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs), it's important to recognize that LRTs are derivatives of LSTs, which introduces additional layers of leverage and complexities:

LST Risks:

• Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Dependence on smart contract integrity poses a considerable risk; if compromised, it may lead to substantial losses.
• Node Operator Risks: Faults from node operators can result in penalties, directly impacting token value and yield.
• Regulatory Uncertainty: Evolving regulations can influence LST operation and market acceptance, affecting stability and value.

LRT Risks:

• Added Complexity and Risk: As a derivative, LRTs inherit all the risks of LSTs but with added complexities from engaging multiple protocols, heightening the potential for errors and vulnerabilities in smart contracts.
• Extended Security Exposure: LRTs participate in securing additional networks, amplifying exposure to security risks if one of the involved networks is compromised.
• Market and Liquidity Concerns: LRTs, being newer and more complex, may face hurdles in market adoption which can affect their liquidity and pricing stability.

In essence, while both tokens boost liquidity and staking yields, LRTs, by virtue of their derivative nature, carry compounded risks from LSTs, adding more layers of potential vulnerabilities and market uncertainties.

‍

Closing Thoughts

In summary, Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) and Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) both enhance liquidity and broaden utility within proof of stake networks, giving investors more capital efficiency and yields. LSTs are a tradable receipt for staked assets (e.g. stETH), maintaining liquidity even as assets are locked in staking. LRTs build on this concept by allowing these staked assets to secure additional networks, further leveraging the original stake.

Nonetheless, the innovative mechanism of LRTs, while offering potential for increased returns, also carries added risks due to its complex nature and broader security exposure to multiple protocols. Investors must weigh these factors when integrating LRTs into their investment strategies.