Bitcoin
BTC
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Ethereum
ETH
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Solana
SOL
$
00000.00
-0.00%
XRP
XRP
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Dogecoin
DOGE
$
00000.00
-0.00%
ChainLink
LINK
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Binance Coin
BNB
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Cardano
ADA
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Litecoin
LTC
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Ordinals
ORDI
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Polygon
MATIC
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Optimism
OP
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Arbitrum
ARB
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Polkadot
DOT
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Avalanche
AVAX
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Sui
SUI
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Ethereum Classic
ETC
$
00000.00
-0.00%
FileCoin
FIL
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Celestia 
TIA
$
00000.00
-0.00%
Injective
INJ
$
00000.00
-0.00%

Key Takeaway

MetaMask and Trust Wallet cater to two distinct kinds of crypto users. MetaMask is the most popular wallet for Ethereum and EVM chains like BNB Chain, Avalanche, and layer 2’s like Arbitrum. It is the most composable desktop and mobile wallet in DeFi and is compatible with all popular onchain applications.

Trust Wallet, on the other hand, differentiates itself by supporting EVM and non-EVM chains like Solana and Bitcoin. Both wallets offer equivalent security features, so your choice really depends on your needs. Overall, MetaMask is best for Ethereum users and Trust Wallet for non-EVM chain explorers.

This review and rating adhere to our editorial policy and the the research methodology of StacksOnChain analysts, guaranteeing the accuracy and reliability of our reports.

Rating

Difference Between MetaMask and Trust Wallet

MetaMask and Trust Wallet are two of the most popular and widely used cryptocurrency wallets. Each serves its user with crucial features for managing digital assets. MetaMask is known for its integration across the Ethereum network and primarily acts as a gateway for users to interact with ETH's vast ecosystem of decentralized applications. It supports all EVM-compatible blockchains and layer 2's like Arbitrum, Base, BNB Chain, Avalanche, zkSync and others, accessible through an easy to use browser extension and mobile app.

On the other hand, Trust Wallet is known for its compatibility with both EVM and non-EVM chains including Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin, Tron and Cosmos. Also, it's primary focus is on its mobile wallet, which makes it a good choice for users who are active across chains and prefer managing their crypto on their phone. Similar to MetaMask, it offers access to DApps but expands its utility with features like in-wallet staking and direct cryptocurrency purchases with a credit card.

Both wallets incorporate high security standards to protect user assets. However, MetaMask’s seamless browser integration makes it ideal for users frequently interacting with DApps, while Trust Wallet’s diverse blockchain support and mobile-focused design appeal to users looking for multi-chain flexibility.

Trust Wallet.

Security

Comparing the security features of MetaMask and Trust Wallet reveals a nuanced landscape of crypto wallet safety. MetaMask, primarily serving over 30 million users as an Ethereum and ERC-20 focused browser extension, offers robust security measures such as encryption, Blockaid for preempting transaction risks, and the use of seed phrases for wallet recovery. However, being a "hot wallet," it is always connected to the internet, which inherently increases potential security risks, thereby making it advisable to pair it with a hardware wallet for an added layer of security.

Trust Wallet, on the other hand, backed by a user base of over 100 million, emphasizes a slightly different approach to security. It leverages multiple layers of security, including strong encryption and secure cloud backups to prevent asset loss. It also offers the convenience of connecting to hardware wallets, enhancing its security framework. Trust Wallet audits its systems through independent security firms, ensuring up-to-date safeguarding against vulnerabilities. 

Both wallets apply comprehensive security features tailored to their respective user bases. Trust Wallet is overall the better option in terms of safety and privacy as it provides more advanced and robust security measures.

Trust Wallet Security.

MetaMask vs Trust Wallet Fees

When comparing the fee structures of MetaMask and Trust Wallet, both wallets provide user-friendly solutions but with distinct fee strategies. MetaMask incorporates a service fee of 0.875% in each swap quote. This fee supports ongoing developments and enhancements in MetaMask's services. MetaMask strives for cost-efficiency by optimizing gas fees and minimizing slippage through broad DEX integration, ensuring competitive pricing and reduced transaction costs for its users.

On the other hand, Trust Wallet offers a freemium model where the wallet itself and basic in-app transactions don't incur direct fees from the wallet; however, users are still subject to network fees, which can be customized. For purchasing cryptocurrencies directly through the app, Trust Wallet applies a 1% fee atop the third-party provider's charges, which can be waived if the user holds at least 100 Trust Wallet Tokens (TWT), available in BEP2, BEP20, or SPL formats.

Overall, MetaMask has a 0.125% lower cryptocurrency swap fee, making it the more affordable option.

MetaMask Fees.

Features and Services

MetaMask and Trust Wallet offer a variety of features designed to meet the needs of diverse cryptocurrency and DeFi user bases. Here’s a breakdown of what each platform offers:

MetaMask Features:

  • MetaMask Portfolio: MetaMask provides a user-friendly dashboard where users can buy, sell and swap cryptocurrencies, as well as a bridging and staking feature. This makes it easy for users to interact with DeFi projects, NFTs, and more.
  • Staking: Users can stake their crypto to earn rewards while also diversifying their portfolio through various DeFi platforms directly within the MetaMask interface.
  • Mobile and Desktop Compatability: MetaMask is accessible from all types of devices and can be downloaded on both the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store.
  • Security and Self-Custody: Safety comes first with MetaMask, where it prioritizes strong security measures and self-custody, allowing users to control their private keys and data securely.
  • Innovative Extensions: Through MetaMask Snaps, users can customize their wallet by adding features that enhance the wallet’s utility, ranging from account management tools to new blockchain interactions.

Trust Wallet Features:

  • Swaps: Trust Wallet allows for secure and seamless swapping of cryptocurrencies. With options to swap over a million cryptocurrency pairs directly from the mobile app or browser extension, the feature focuses on minimizing slippage and finding the best ratest.
  • Staking: For users looking to earn passive income while contributing to network security, Trust Wallet offers staking, providing users with a simple way to earn rewards and enhance the decentralization and security of blockchain networks.
  • NFTs: Users can manage, store, and explore NFTs across multiple blockchains all within the wallet, connecting easily to popular NFT marketplaces for trading and acquiring digital assets.
  • Security: Security is paramount in Trust Wallet’s design, keeping your assets and your Web3 journey safe. Through robust encryption and continuous security updates, the wallet ensures that users' digital assets and interactions within the Web3 space are protected against vulnerabilities.
  • Buy Crypto: Trust Wallet facilitates the quick and easy purchase of cryptocurrencies, allowing transactions to be completed in under five minutes. The wallet supports a broad range of payment options, including Apple Pay and Google Pay, ensuring that users globally can easily buy crypto using their preferred payment method.

Both MetaMask and Trust Wallet are equipped with helpful features that cater to a broad audience within the crypto space, focusing on ease of use, security, and a crisp user experience. That said, MetaMask provides wider accessibility due to its compatibility with mobile, tablet and desktop devices and has a more diverse selection of features.

MetaMask Portfolio.

Closing Thoughts

Both MetaMask and Trust Wallet offer secure platforms optimized for different yet overlapping user bases within the crypto community. MetaMask stands out for its integration with Ethereum and other EVM-compatible blockchains, appealing to users who frequently engage with decentralized applications. Trust Wallet provides broader multi-chain support and a mobile experience, making it ideal for users who prioritize flexibility and on-the-go access. 

Ultimately, the choice between MetaMask and Trust Wallet should be guided by individual needs regarding device compatibility, preferred blockchain ecosystems, and the specific features each user values most, such as MetaMask's comprehensive Web3 explorations and Trust Wallet's enhanced mobile usability and security features.

Author

Chris Wheelan spearheads operations and sales at StacksOnChain, leveraging his extensive background in marketing and partnerships within traditional financial services. He plays a crucial role in guiding the company's strategic trajectory and nurturing vital relationships, ensuring StacksOnChain's alignment with evolving industry trends and opportunities.

View posts

Featured Guides

Learn more with some of the featured guides recommended by our analysts.

Dive into Berachain, where DeFi meets innovation through EVM compatibility, a novel liquidity consensus, and integrated DeFi applications.
Chris Wheelan
May 18, 2024
Research

What is Berachain?

Dive into Berachain, where DeFi meets innovation through EVM compatibility, a novel liquidity consensus, and integrated DeFi applications.

Explore how EigenLayer Restaked Points measure user contributions with ETH staked, impact EIGEN token distribution, and face geo-restrictions.
Richard Zhang
Apr 30, 2024
Research

What are EigenLayer Restaked Points?

Explore how EigenLayer Restaked Points measure user contributions with ETH staked, impact EIGEN token distribution, and face geo-restrictions.